← All companies
Rank #7 · Marine / Dredging Contractor

Boskalis

Evidence basis: Activity-level evidence (marine)Marine relevance: Direct (marine dredging)
Good
72.5
Final / 100
Future Commitments
13.4
/ 25
54%
Significant gaps
Environmental Action
35.0
/ 46
76%
Solid performance
Governance & Accountability
17.6
/ 20
88%
Strong performance

Why this score?

  • Score is supported by: Low-impact / responsible extraction commitment (score 5/5)
  • Additional strength: Water quality and effluent management (score 5/5)
  • Score is constrained by: Scope coverage and value-chain emissions (score 2/5)
  • Evidence basis: Activity-level evidence (marine).
  • Performance is interpreted through marine-specific evidence (vessel emissions, dredging, sediment, marine permitting).

Key strengths

  • Low-impact / responsible extraction commitment (score 5/5)
  • Water quality and effluent management (score 5/5)
  • Supplier / contractor environmental due diligence and assurance (score 5/5)

Main gaps

  • Scope coverage and value-chain emissions (score 2/5)
  • Absolute emissions progress vs baseline (score 2/5)
  • Net-zero / climate transition target (score 3/5)
Sector-relevant substitute applied: Water withdrawal, consumption and discharge · Tailings / mineral residue / waste rock management

Evidence behind the score

Raw evidence summary, scoring rationale and weighted contribution for each of the 15 metrics, written from reviewed public sustainability materials.

Future Commitments
Raw evidence summary

Boskalis has a clear operational climate ambition. It aims for net-zero emissions across its own operations, Scope 1 and 2, by 2050, aligned with the IMO net-zero transition pathway for international shipping. It also has a separate ambition for onshore Boskalis projects in the Netherlands to become climate neutral by 2030.

Scoring rationale

Net-zero Scope 1+2 by 2050; aligned with IMO; not full-Scope SBTi.

Raw evidence summary

Boskalis targets a 10% reduction in fleet carbon intensity by 2030, compared with a 2023 baseline. This target is aligned with the IMO pathway and is expected to be achieved through energy-efficiency measures, voyage optimisation, emissions dashboards, hull / propeller efficiency, battery packs and greater use of renewable fuels.

Scoring rationale

10% fleet carbon intensity by 2030 vs 2023; sector-relevant target.

Raw evidence summary

Boskalis reports Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions for its own operations. In 2025, total Scope 1+2 emissions were 1.502 million metric tonnes CO₂e, compared with 1.403 million metric tonnes CO₂e in 2024. Its vessels accounted for around 99% of Scope 1+2 emissions. A full Scope 3 inventory is not clearly disclosed in the same way as larger listed corporates.

Scoring rationale

Scope 1+2 reported; vessels 99%; full Scope 3 inventory not clearly disclosed.

Environmental Action
Raw evidence summary

Boskalis’ responsible marine / extractive evidence is strongest through its Good Stewardship strategy, responsible sand extraction, biodiversity framework, environmental monitoring and nature-based solutions. The company explicitly identifies responsible sand extraction, biodiversity and ecosystems, turbidity, pollution, invasive species and underwater noise as material sustainability topics for its dredging and marine contracting activities.

Scoring rationale

Good Stewardship; responsible sand extraction; explicit marine materiality.

Raw evidence summary

Boskalis does not disclose a simple production-style intensity such as kgCO₂e per tonne dredged material. Instead, it uses an internally developed fleet carbon intensity ratio, aligned with the IMO intensity approach, to express emissions relative to the utilised installed power of vessels. The key benchmark metric is therefore fleet carbon intensity, with a 10% reduction target by 2030 versus 2023.

Scoring rationale

Fleet carbon intensity ratio aligned with IMO; sector-appropriate.

Raw evidence summary

Absolute Scope 1+2 emissions increased from 1.403 million tCO₂e in 2024 to 1.502 million tCO₂e in 2025. This means the absolute emissions trend worsened year-on-year, mainly because Boskalis is a vessel-heavy marine contractor and activity levels / project mix influence fuel consumption. The stronger decarbonisation evidence is therefore intensity-based rather than absolute-emissions reduction.

Scoring rationale

Absolute Scope 1+2 increased 1.403→1.502 Mt due to project mix.

Raw evidence summary

Boskalis does not disclose a conventional water withdrawal / consumption / discharge table. For this benchmark, water should be interpreted through marine water-quality management, dredging impacts, turbidity control, coastal protection and marine ecosystem protection rather than corporate water-use volumes. This is a disclosure gap compared with companies reporting detailed water withdrawal and discharge data.

Scoring rationale

Conventional withdrawal not material; substituted via marine water quality.

Raw evidence summary

Boskalis provides strong project-level water-quality evidence through turbidity management. In Sohar, Oman, Boskalis used an advanced computer model to forecast dredging-induced turbidity near a sensitive seawater intake, supported by sensors, buoys, satellite imagery and live turbidity measurements. In 2025, Boskalis reported one turbidity exceedance on projects with a turbidity scope.

Scoring rationale

Sohar turbidity model; 1 turbidity exceedance in 2025; live monitoring.

Raw evidence summary

Boskalis has a dedicated Biodiversity Framework covering nature-based solutions, priority habitats and species, pollution, invasive species, turbidity and underwater noise. The framework includes commitments to consider precautionary mitigation near priority biodiversity, sensitive breeding / migration patterns, and efforts to minimise strikes of marine mammals, marine turtles and coral.

Scoring rationale

Dedicated Biodiversity Framework; turbidity, noise, invasive species addressed.

Raw evidence summary

Boskalis’ key impact is marine and coastal habitat disturbance from dredging, seabed preparation, land reclamation, subsea rock installation, cable installation and coastal protection. The report does not disclose a single total seabed area disturbed or dredged-area KPI. However, project examples show material marine activity, including the Sohar dredging project, Walvis Bay channel deepening, offshore wind foundation / cable works, scour protection and land reclamation in the Maldives.

Scoring rationale

Marine project examples disclosed; consolidated seabed-area KPI not given.

Raw evidence summary

Boskalis’ strongest restoration evidence is not mine closure, but nature-based coastal protection and habitat restoration. In 2025, it worked on Dutch projects improving local biodiversity and water quality by restoring or expanding habitats for fish, macrofauna and aquatic plants. It also continued monitoring artificial reefs and nature enhancements at Hengistbury Head, where early results showed diverse marine life including mussels, crabs and shellfish.

Scoring rationale

Nature-based coastal protection; artificial reef monitoring at Hengistbury.

Raw evidence summary

Formal mining-style tailings / TSF / GISTM evidence is not applicable to Boskalis. The closest equivalent is dredged sediment, seabed material handling, subsea rock installation, dredging overflow / turbidity control and responsible sand extraction. Benchmark wording should be: tailings not applicable; marine sediment and dredging-impact management evidence present.

Scoring rationale

Tailings not applicable; sediment & dredging-overflow management substitutes.

Raw evidence summary

Boskalis provides circularity evidence mainly through sustainable ship recycling and vessel dismantling. It follows the Hong Kong Convention, EU Ship Recycling Regulation and its own standards. For vessels above 500 GT that are dismantled or sold, Boskalis prepares an Inventory of Hazardous Materials. In 2025, the dismantling of a 500 GT+ pontoon was completed in the Netherlands in compliance with the EU Ship Recycling Regulation.

Scoring rationale

Sustainable ship recycling; Hong Kong Convention; group waste KPI absent.

Governance & Accountability
Raw evidence summary

Boskalis reports clear marine incident indicators. In 2025, it recorded one turbidity exceedance on projects with a turbidity scope and one spill into water. The spill occurred when a hydraulic hose burst during dredging operations and involved biodegradable oil, with limited impact on the marine environment. Boskalis also uses Environmental Monitoring and Management Plans and adaptive management to meet project-specific environmental requirements.

Scoring rationale

1 turbidity exceedance, 1 biodegradable spill; EMP/adaptive management used.

Raw evidence summary

Boskalis has strong supplier governance evidence. Strategic suppliers account for at least 75% of annual spend. In 2025, 87% of strategic suppliers by spend signed or endorsed the Supplier Code of Conduct. Suppliers complete a pre-qualification process and may be assessed on health and safety, quality, environmental, CSR, financial / insurance or supply-chain management criteria. Since 2012, Boskalis has conducted Implementation Scans at 206 suppliers, including 71 visits to foreign suppliers in 25 countries.

Scoring rationale

87% strategic suppliers signed Code; 206 Implementation Scans since 2012.