Sector lens, proxy boundaries and caveats
Sector-relevant interpretation
The same 15 metrics are applied across all companies, but interpreted through a sector-relevant lens.
Water and habitat metrics are interpreted through turbidity, seabed disturbance, dredged sediment, vessel emissions and marine permitting.
Emphasis on quarrying, aggregates, water, biodiversity, rehabilitation and circular materials.
Emphasis on land disturbance, water, mineral residue / tailings, rehabilitation, closure planning and value-chain emissions.
Proxy and boundary notes
Where company-specific marine-asset data is unavailable, group-level or parent-company evidence is used as a proxy and is labelled as such. Proxy data is not presented as direct subsidiary-level performance.
Benchmark caveat
Scores are based on reviewed public sustainability evidence and are intended for comparative benchmarking. They should not be read as a definitive ESG rating. Higher scores generally indicate stronger quantified disclosure and more mature sustainability systems. Lower scores may reflect limited public disclosure, smaller company scale, proxy reporting boundaries or development-stage assets rather than weaker underlying sustainability performance.